From the Radio Free Michigan archives ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu. ------------------------------------------------ The following was sent to me, the author wishes to remain anonymous. Before you hire an attorney for a class action challange on gun ownership or constitutional issues, perhaps you best read the following. It is most informative and perhaps you will recognise why "We, the People" don't often win in the courts. It addresses questions that can no longer remain silent. One profession conspicuously missing from the list of professions licensed by the Secretary of State to do business in this Commonwealth is ATTORNEY and/or Judge. Why isn't the STATE licensing the lawyers and judges to insure their competence and their adherence to constitutional law? The State courts are a fraud. They are all privately controlled by the private members who practice their business in it. If the ABA is licensed as a corporation to do business in the State like any major insurance company, then their members, (attorneys), must also be licensed, as are the agents for the insurance company. Lawyers only have a certificate from either the private American Bar Association or the college they graduated from. How can a private corporation have STATE licensing power? Isn't the STATE's responsibility to license. If the private corporation ABA can issue a license to practice law, why can't the private corporation General Motors issue a license to drive a car? We all know the ABA issues licenses to lawyers who then go on to become judges. Therefore, no court belongs to the people or government, as none of the practitioners' are licensed by the State, but are licensed by a private corporation that is allowed to do business in this State, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Judges and attorneys belong to and are licensed by the private American Bar Association. The ABA has created a private judiciary and court system. This conclusive presumption of private judiciary can easily be shown. See Cromelin v. United States, 177 F2d 275; LePatourel cases, 571 F 2d 405 & 593 F 2d 827; Viola A. Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F Supp. 673; Foster v. McBride, 521 F 2d 1304, where it is stated that all judges are under a private judiciary. No one is allowed to "practice law" in any court unless they are a member of this private organization. Therefore, all judges are beholding to this private organization or they lose the license it gives them. No attorney/judge is ever licensed by the state government that they practice in to do business in the private ABA courts. How can a judge swear to uphold the Constitution when he takes office knowing that he belongs to a private club whose orders he must follow, or he will loose his license to practice law. Attorney's know that accepting a license places the licensee under the jurisdiction of the licenser. Wouldn't the ABA, by relinquishing its licensing power to the State, have to abandon its private, quasi, colorable law, and its privately run courts. If the State doesn't license attorneys, can they prevent any other private licensing body from authorizing the practice of law in this State? Should the State allow an attorney or judge who is not licensed by it to practice in its courts? If the State allows the attorneys licensed by the ABA as adequate to use our courts, should the courts be paid for with public tax dollars. Is it constitutional for the State to allow a private corporation to control the use of the public courts, that are supposed to be for and by the people. So let's start doing something about it by contacting the Secretary of your State and asking for a certified copy of the ABA being registered to do business in the State; the license issued to the attorneys by the State government allowing them to also do business in the State; the recorded oaths of office of the judges and their financial disclosure sheets. Now, if the State doesn't license the attorneys, how can they prevent you from practicing law in the State? How can the State allow an attorney who is not licensed by it to practice in its courts? If the State allows the attorneys to be licensed by the ABA as being adequate, then they are allowing a private corporation to control the use of the public courts, paid for by tax dollars, that are supposed to be for and by the people, correct? Also remember to do this process with the United States Secretary of State for Federal judges and attorneys. Then make sure the State allows the Federal judges and U.S. Attorneys to do business by registering and issuing them a license, for they are just as foreign to your State as your neighboring State. A Pennsylvania attorney can't practice in Ohio without permission, can he? But whose permission, the State or the private ABA controlled court? You all complain about the court system, now let's rattle their cages and see how a cornered rat reacts. ************************************************************************* Send comments or private communication to list moderator/admin Howard L. Bloom at pc-man@netaxs.com. All posts are the responsibility of the poster. Howard L. Bloom assumes no liability for the content of any message per UCC 1-207 with explicit reservation of rights.. To unsubscribe or subcribe send email to "no-con-con-request@webcom.com put nothing in the subject line and in body put either unsubscribe or subscribe. ------------------------------------------------ (This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer. All files are ZIP archives for fast download. E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)