ADV Directory || National Alliance Main Page

Broadcast date: 2-24-96


by Kevin Alfred Strom

What our would-be masters plan for America is symbolized by what they are planning for one of our country's minor commercial icons. In 1921, the Washburn Crosby Company, manufacturer of baking goods, decided they needed a spokeswoman to respond to the many questions they were receiving in the mail from their customers. They borrowed a last name from a retired member of their board of directors, "William Crocker," held a contest among their employees to choose a signature for her (which is still used today), and named her, "Betty Crocker." In 1936, her portrait was painted and her motherly image began to appear on the company's millions of boxes in supermarkets across America. Her portrait has been redone several times in the last 60 years, but two things have remained constant: Betty has always worn red and she has always been White. That last quality is about to change, according to General Mills, which now owns the Betty Crocker brand.

A few years back, General Mills removed Betty Crocker's face from their packages. She was apparently too White -- too suggestive of the old America of manicured lawns, safe neighborhoods, high standards, and Western culture -- to be acceptable to the trendy New World Order camp followers in General Mills' boardroom.

The 75-year-old cultural icon had to go, regardless of its commercial appeal.

But the trendies at General Mills have something worse in store for us. They are going to put Betty back on their packages, alright. But first, they are planning to create a new Betty Crocker. A non-White Betty Crocker.

Oh, they're not man enough to come right out and say that's what they're doing. No, they are cloaking it in all kinds of deceptive verbiage. But making Betty Crocker into some kind of Third World mongrel is exactly what they have in mind.

As a pretended celebration of Betty Crocker's 75th Anniversary, General Mills is going to select 75 real women who are residents of the United States, photograph them, and then digitally "morph" them into one composite face which will become the new Betty Crocker. As anyone with even a cursory knowledge of computer software knows, this "morphing" process can yield almost any result desired by the computer operator, and will not necessarily result in a statistical average of the input images. And what will the computer operator be looking for? According to the Wall Street Journal, "Since the contest is open to would-be Bettys of all races... the hybrid homemaker is likely to emerge with more politically correct features."

General Mills spokesman Craig Shulstad states, "We're hoping for ethnic diversity, which is what's happening with homemakers and society as a whole." According to the Capital-Times of Madison, Wisconsin, "The resulting face, according to some diversity experts, will be a woman with a slightly tan complexion, Asian-looking eyes, and a slightly broader nose. .These features should appeal to the growing Hispanic, Asian, and Black markets."

A White Betty Crocker is "offensive" to some. Apparently, according to Russell Adams, chairman of African-American studies at Howard University, a Black institution in occupied Washington, DC, a mixed-race Betty Crocker wouldn't offend anyone. Well, General Mills, I am offended.

In the early days of the post-World War II period, the advertising agencies sold us on racial "integration" by showing us happy consumers and schoolchildren, mostly White and all well-dressed, frolicking in what still looked like the Old America, with just a few almost-White mulattos around the edges, eating in our restaurants and playing in our playgrounds. It was just a matter of "fairness" and letting a few non-Whites in on our wonderful America. Nothing else about our country would change. Why, who could object to that? Wicked ignorant bigoted racists warned us then that Whites were the real minority in this world and that the actual objective of the whole "civil rights" program was to get our daughters Nicole Simpsoned and our sons Jeffrey Dahmered, or, failing that, at least turn them against us and enlist them in the revolution against White America through communist brainwashing in the schools and the media.

Those wicked, ignorant, bigoted racists said that the real purpose of the "integration" program was just that -- actual physical integration of the races, sperm with egg, DNA with DNA, and so ushering in the death of our race and nation. Those wicked, ignorant, bigoted racists! How dare they be so right.

Well, the racemixing program is out in the open now. No advertising agency, no department store, dares to issue a catalog or an ad without including Black boys touching or fondling White girls or something of the kind. If America's enemies had come right out with such images 30 or 40 years ago, their revolution would have met with serious resistance. Today, a mongrel Betty Crocker tells everything about our degradation without a single word. Who would have thought that Betty Crocker would be the one to symbolize our planned demise, so neatly, so commercially, so unfeelingly, so pathetically.

The address for General Mills, Incorporated is:
1 General Mills Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55426

Their telephone number is: (612) 540-2311
Their fax number is: (612) 540-4925

One of my small pleasures in life is bird watching, which gives me a great deal of peace in this world of constant conflict. Over the years, I have discovered that there is a great deal to be learned from our avian neighbors, lessons that illustrate the laws of Nature that apply to us as much as to them.

Recently, a listener sent me this article from the Richmond, Virginia Times-Dispatch, entitled, "Songbirds in the Midwest are singing cowbird blues -- Raising orphaned chicks wipes out foster families":

The Midwest has become a disaster area for migrant songbirds and a paradise for a feathered freeloader who tricks other birds into raising its young.

Songbirds that fly thousands of miles from South America to nest in the forests of the Midwest are being pushed toward population collapse by cowbirds that lay eggs in other birds' nests and force the hosts to feed and nurture cowbird chicks.

A study to be published today in the journal Science shows that migrant songbird populations are in steep decline in the Midwest, and naturalist, Scott K. Robinson, of the Illinois Natural History Survey, says that parasitic cowbirds are the principal cause. Robinson said a single cowbird female lays eggs in a dozen songbird nests and then leaves them in the songbirds' care. "The cowbirds hatch earlier, grow faster and then crowd out the host young," said Robinson. "The songbird young just starve to death."

Robinson said the cowbirds are thriving in the Midwest because the big woods have been felled for farm fields and pastures, depriving the migrant songbirds of the protection of the deep forests. The songbirds include tanagers, warblers, thrushes, flycatchers, and grosbeaks.

A survey by more than 125 researchers and assistants of 5,000 nesting sites in five states found that up to 50 per cent of the songbirds were not successful in raising young. This is not enough to maintain the songbird population at those sites, said Robinson. The survey was done in Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Missouri.

"These birds don't have an evolutionary history of dealing with cowbirds," said Robinson. "They haven't learned to recognize that a cowbird egg is not their egg and that cowbird young are not their young."

Most migrant songbirds, he said, "imprint on the young and take care of whatever is in the nest," even if it is a cowbird chick. Some resident birds, however, won't tolerate the freeloading cowbirds.

"The Baltimore Oriole will puncture a cowbird egg and throw it out," he said. Robins also reject the cowbird egg. Both robins and orioles are thriving.

Robinson said that the study shows that the problem could be corrected by establishing a network of forests no smaller than 20,000 acres. This is the minimum size, he said, to give the migrant songbirds a haven from the cowbirds.

I'm amazed that the controlled media allowed that article to leave their presses in that form, but there it is. There are so many lessons to be learned there.

Here we have beautiful, brightly colored, noble-looking creatures with sweet poetry and music their art; threatened by ugly brown parasite birds, whose only distinction is that they can sometimes fool the beautiful ones into thinking that there is no difference between them.

Here we have parasite young crowding out the legitimate young in the nest. Have you seen a big-city classroom recently? Here we have parents spending their precious time and energy feeding and caring for the parasite young. Its parallel is the vast wealth and even lives which are squandered to "uplift" the forever miserable here or overseas. Its parallel is the Christian Children's Fund and interracial adoptions fostered by our governments and our churches. We are digging our graves with a stupid -- extremely stupid -- smile on our foolish White faces.

The songbirds are dying as we will die. Some populations have fallen as much as 93% and experts are predicting multiple extinctions across this continent. As the warbler's trill is replaced by the raucous cowbird squawk, so Vivaldi is eclipsed by killer rap.

What is the solution for the songbirds? What are the only hopes for their survival? One was mentioned in the Times-Dispatch article I quoted. It is the establishment of a habitat for the songbirds, to give the songbirds a "haven from the cowbirds." The songbirds need -- as we also need -- and as every species needs to survive, a defendable territory of its own, where its parasites and other enemies are not present, where it can raise its own young, and its own precious and uniquely wonderful and beautiful genetic heritage will be passed on, unmixed, to the next generation. Without our own territory we perish. A nation that declares itself a melting-pot of all races will soon cease to be anything but a graveyard for its people.

Now songbirds could survive the clearing of the forests, if that was all there was to it. They nest reasonably well in meadows and near farmer's fields. Change of habitat by itself isn't fatal. It is that due to the clearing of their traditional forest habitat, they are now forced to share all their territory with cowbirds. In other words, they are being forcibly integrated with cowbirds. It is the integration with cowbirds that is fatal. Give songbirds their own territory, by whatever means, and they will thrive again.

A Discover magazine article last year mentioned another, more controversial solution advocated by some conservationists. In areas where the last remaining songbirds are now threatened, they are capturing and killing the invading cowbirds with poison gas. The results? I quote:

Some [songbird] species are in trouble ...they're raising too many baby cowbirds and not enough young of their own. Among the songbirds that have been pushed closer to extinction by cowbirds are the Least Bell's Vireo of California, the Black-Capped Vireo of Texas, and the Kirtland's Warbler of Michigan. The situation has forced conservationists into the uncomfortable position of advocating cowbird extermination programs.

"While we don't like killing cowbirds," says Jane Griffith, a biological consultant, "we do like to hear the songs of endangered species." On a local level, at least, such programs seem to help. An example is the one that Griffith and her husband, John Griffith, have worked on at Camp Pendleton, a Marine base in Oceanside, California, that is one of the last refuges of the Least Bell's Vireo. In the early 1980s, half the vireo nests there were parasitized. By 1994, after some 4,800 cowbirds had been trapped and gassed with carbon monoxide, parasitism had declined to 1 percent. More important, the number of male vireos had increased more than fifteenfold, from 27 in 1981 to 420 in 1993. Similar success has been reported by cowbird control program at Fort Hood, Texas, which has become a retreat for the Black-Capped Vireo.

Some bird species, especially orioles and robins, are thriving despite efforts by the cowbirds to parasitize them. They are thriving because they do not welcome the cowbirds to their nests. They are thriving because they defend their territory from invaders. They are thriving because they will puncture the cowbird's egg and eject it from the nest. The Condor magazine, for August 1995, mentioned another species, Couch's Kingbird, that has successfully resisted parasitism. What is the successful survival technique of Couch's Kingbird? -- Egg discrimination. What natural survival technique has been made into a crime and into a dirty word by our enemies? The ability to discriminate - which simply means to choose - sometimes makes the difference between life and death.

There are other amazing parallels between the cowbirds' parasitism and our dispossession. Since they don't have the burden of raising her own young, cowbirds reproduce at a much faster rate than other bird species. A single female cowbird can lay as many as 50 eggs in a single breeding season. Since welfare recipients are freed of much of the burden of raising their broods, they also ...well, you get the picture. And you also know who carries the burden.

And as we are threatened by multiform parasites, both those already here and those flowing across our southern border, so are the songbirds. Read this excerpt from the Discover magazine article:

Meanwhile, a new threat to songbirds has surfaced -- an invasion of another species of cowbird. Since 1985 the Shiny Cowbird of South America has been sighted in Florida. According to Alexander Cruz, a biologist at the University of Colorado in Boulder, it hasn't yet been caught parasitizing nests, but that's just a matter of time.

Ladies and gentlemen, I have am doing my best to bring you a lesson from Nature. For if we as a people continue to violate Nature's laws, we shall surely perish.

ADV Directory || National Alliance Main Page