Jew Watch

Keeping a Close Watch on Jewish Communities & Organizations Worldwide

Top: Jewish Occupied Governments: Jewish Penetration of Vatican City

Vatican Jewish Paper Shows Judiazation of Catholicism...

03-16-98 by Winston G. Evans, top of page World NEWS Syndicate Service

(NEW YORK) The Vatican announcement apologizing to the Jews arrived this week with the "big lie" which said that anti-Semitism was fueled by 'erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people'' engendered ``feelings of hostility toward this people.''' Nothing could be farther from the truth, and this commentary is filled with proof that the Jews earned every drop of hatred, because the Jews were the very first to spew it, and they still spew it at Christians through the ADL, JDL, ACLU, Democratic Party, all the major newspapers, networks, news rooms, film studios, and other operatives which the Jews either own or control or both.

As the years roll by, religious leaders--whose distance in time blinds them from the realities of early Christianity in which Jews regularly stoned Christians and chased them from cities across the entire expanse of the Roman Empire--now begin to make "the false peace" with their sworn enemies, the Jews.

The Jews are no Saints, although, as owners of the news media, they love to paint themselves in this light. Yet, their own little religious nation of Israel is a state terror organization which owns atomic bombs, poison gas, anthrax, and other mass extermination weapons. Nonetheless when Iraq or Libya, neither of which will mouth Jewish rhetoric, perform some act, it is flashed upon our Jewish owned media immediately. Even a lone Jew walking through Jerusalem who is stabbed by an Arab gets coverage on the front section of America's mostly Jewish-owned newspapers and on the mostly Jewish-owned NEWS networks, as though what happened to a single Jew in Jerusalem were in even the slightest way relevant to anything that Americans would need to know; and, in most cases, 20-30 such stabbings probably occurred in each and every American city that very same day without receiving any coverage in the Jewish owned newspapers of America. Why? Because to a Jew, Jews are important and non-Jews, who are called 'goyim' or trash by Jews in their private conversations and in The Talmud which many Jews follow, are nothing but people who work to make Jews wealthy. That is a part of their literature--e.g., Old Testament, Talmud, Kaballah--where hundreds of references to the Jewish racism against non-Jews is totally open for all to see.

Here. Let me help you by giving you the insight of a postnet crossposting:

Jews Helping Only Jews as Detailed in Their Mosaic Law

Loaning money: "He [the Jew] should not press his fellow [Jew] for payment.. the foreigner [Gentile] you may press for payment..." Deuteronomy 15: 2,3

"You must not make your brother pay interest, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything on which one may claim interest. You may make a foreigner [Gentile] pay interest but your brother [fellow Jew] you must not make pay interest." Deuteronomy 23: 19,20

[This is how they become so rich today in any country they are allowed to set up shop. They can't generate any wealth on their own and Israel is the best example. They won't exploit each other. ]

Indebtedness: "And in case your brother [fellow Jew] grows poor alongside you and he has to sell himself to you, you must not use him for slavish service. As for the slave man and your slave girl who become yours from the [Gentile] nations that are round about you people, from them you may buy a slave man and a slave girl. And you must pass them on as an inheritance to your sons after you to inherit as a possession to time indefinite. You may use them as workers, but upon the sons of Israel, you must not tread, the one upon the other, with tyranny." Leviticus 25: 39,44,46

[Notice that Jews only worked their Gentile "slaves" with tyranny BUT not their indebted Jewish "slaves!" Gentiles were to be passed down as any other livestock as an inheritance but notice that Jews were not- they were to be released after six years of indebtedness as described in Deuteronomy 15: 12,13 which says: "In case there should be sold to you your brother, a Hebrew or a Hebrewess, and he has served you six years, then in the seventh year you should send him out from you as one set free... you must not send him away empty handed." No Gentile had any such provision of release- it looks as if Jews Only Help Jews.]

Slavery & Genocide: "In case you draw near to city to fight against it, you must announce to it terms of peace. And it must occur that if it gives a peaceful answer to you and it has opened up to you, it must occur that ALL the people found in it should become yours for forced labor, and they must serve you. But if it does not make peace with you and it actually makes war with you and you have to besiege it, you must strike every male in it with the edge of the sword. Only the women and the little children and the domestic animals and everything that happens to be in the city, all of its spoil you will plunder for yourselves; and you must eat the spoil of your enemies. That is the way you will do to all the cities very far away from you that are not of the cities of these nations. It is only of the cities of these people that you must not preserve anything alive."

[All scripture taken from Deuteronomy 20: 10-16 Jews were to give the Gentiles a choice of being their slaves and servants or be killed! Another case of Jews Only Helping Jews!]

So, you see, the Old Testament, which has, by the way, many other racist statements about Jews killing non-Jews and how that is an excellent idea, is truly a racist document.

Let us turn to the Roman Historian, Tacitus, who wrote about the Jews and their hatred for non-Jews in detail:

Jews Attitude Toward the Gentiles

In conjunction with the study of several New Testament epistles, such as the Epistle to Titus, this paper will give some insight into some of the difficulties facing local church congregations of the early church as they tried to come to grips with the great cultural differences between Jews and Gentiles.

The first section is a quotation from from Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah.

"And then, as the proud Roman passed on the Sabbath through the streets, Judaism would obtrude itself upon his notice, by the shops that were shut, and by the strange figures that idly moved about in holiday attire. They were strangers in a strange land, not only without sympathy with what passed around, but with marked contempt and abhorrence of it, while there was that about their whole bearing, which expressed the unspoken feeling, that the time of Rome's fall, and of their own supremacy, was at hand.

"To put the general feeling in the words of Tacitus, the Jews kept close together, and were ever most liberal to one another; but they were filled with bitter hatred of all others. They would neither eat nor sleep with strangers; and the first thing which they taught their proselytes was to despise the gods, to renounce their own country, and to rend the bonds which had bound them to parents, children or kindred...",

"To begin with, every Gentile child, so soon as born, was to be regarded as unclean. Those [Gentiles] who actually worshipped mountains, hills, bushes, etc, idolaters, should be cut down with the sword. But as it was impossible to exterminate heathenism, Rabbinic legislation kept certain definite objects in view, which may be summarized:

•To prevent Jews from being inadvertently led into idolatry

•To avoid all participation in idolatry

•Not to do anything which might aid the heathen in their worship; and, beyond all this...

•Not to give pleasure, or even help, to heathens. The latter involved a most dangerous principle, capable of almost indefinite application by fanaticism."

From the Talmudic Tractate Abhodah Zarah, on the subject of idolatry, paraphrased - Even the Mishnah goes so far as to forbid aid to a mother in the hour of her need, or nourishment to her babe, in order not to bring up a child for idolatry. But this is not all. Heathens were, indeed, not to be forced into danger, but yet not to be delivered from it. "The best among the Gentiles, Kill; the best among serpents, crush its head."

Still more terrible was the fanaticism which directed that heretics and those who had left the Jewish faith should be thrown into actual danger, or, if they were already in it, to remove any chance for them to escape. No contact of any kind was to be had with such - not even to call medical aid in case of danger to life, since it was deemed, that he who had to do with heretics was in imminent peril of becoming one himself, and that, if a heretic returned to the true faith, he should die at once - partly to pay for his sin, and partly from fear of relapse.

The Jew had a low estimate of the Gentile's character. The most vile and unnatural crimes were imputed to Gentiles. They considered it not safe to leave cattle in their charge, to allow their women to nurse infants, or their physicians to attend the sick, nor to walk in their company, without taking precautions against sudden attacks.

The Gentiles should, as far as possible, be altogether avoided, except in cases of necessity or for the sake of business. They and theirs were defiled; their houses unclean, as containing idols or things dedicated to idols. Their feasts and their joyous occasions were polluted by idolatry. You could not leave the room if a Gentile was in it because he might, carelessly or on purpose, defile the wine or food on the table, or the oil and wheat in the cupboard.

Under such circumstances, everything must be regarded as unclean. Three days before a heathen festival, and three days after, all business or contact with heathen was avoided, for fear of giving help or pleasure. Jews were to avoid passing through a city where there was an idolatrous feast - nay, they were not even to sit down within the shadow of a tree dedicated to idol-worship. Such a tree's wood was polluted; if it was used in cooking, the bread was unclean; if a shuttle of a loom had been made from it, all the cloth woven on it was forbidden. In addition, if such cloth had been mixed with other pieces of cloth, or if a garment made with it had been placed with other garments, all of the garments became unclean.

Jewish workmen were not to help in building basilicas, stadiums, or places where judicial sentences were pronounced by the heathen. If was not lawful to rent houses or sell cattle to Gentiles. Milk drawn by a heathen, if a Jew had not been present to watch it, bread and oil prepared by them, were unlawful. Their wine was wholly forbidden; the mere touch of a heathen polluted a whole cask of wine. Even to smell of heathen wine was forbidden! If wine had been dedicated to an idol, it defiled a man to carry on a stick even an olive's weight of it. Other wine, if prepared by a heathen, was prohibited for personal use and for trading. Wine prepared by a Jew, however, which had been deposited in the custody of a Gentile, was prohibited for personal use, but it was permitted to sell it.

As for Christianity, which I presume the Catholic Church feels it is a part of, the Jews hounded the Christians in a genocidal frenzy during the Roman Empire as described in the New Testament:

Luke 21:12 "But before all this, they will lay hands on you and persecute you. They will deliver you to synagogues and prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and all on account of my name.

The obvious people doing the persecuting here are the Jews, and they are specifically seen rounding up Christians for the kill. What is the Vatican thinking about saying that 'erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people'' engendered ``feelings of hostility toward this people.''' There is nothing erroneous about Christians hating Jews. In fact, the Jews continue to attempt to eradicate Christianity in every nation where they live. In our own city, two Jews tried to force Florissant to take down a nativity scene under the banner of the First Amendment which was written NOT to destroy Christianity but to preserve it against people like the two Jews who sued--Deborah Jacobs of the ACLU (Anti-Christian Liberties Union) and her operative Mr. Feinstein.

Acts 7:52 Was there ever a prophet your fathers did not persecute? They even killed those who predicted the coming of the Righteous One. And now you have betrayed and murdered him--

The author of Acts, Luke, is definitely saying that the Jews murdered Jesus, and, in fact, they did. Their leaders hounded Jesus, and they even sent a man out to kill Lazarus after Jesus brought Lazarus back to life. That is found in John 12:10.

John Chapter 12 9Meanwhile a large crowd of Jews found out that Jesus was there and came, not only because of him but also to see Lazarus, whom he had raised from the dead. 10So the chief priests made plans to kill Lazarus as well, 11for on account of him many of the Jews were going over to Jesus and putting their faith in him.

So, you see, the Jews have ALWAYS been the direct enemy of Christ and of Christians. And, throughout history, Jews have worked against all forms of religion. In Russia, as the most numerous of the Commissars, the Jews used the Red Revolution to murder 100,000,000 million Christians. Yet, Israel has never paid one cent in reparations, nor do the Jewish newspapers in America ever mention the atrocity of 100 million dead Christians which caused Hitler's rise as a reaction to death from the guns of Jews that communism wanted to place across Western Europe in 1920-1940. Not one mention of this deadly Jewish genocide of Christians occurs in the Vatican's announcement.

In John 11, we see the Jews with with the Jewish High Priest Caiaphus named as plotting to kill Lazarus and Jesus both in order to end his movement of redemption:

John 11 43When he had said this, Jesus called in a loud voice, "Lazarus, come out!" 44The dead man came out, his hands and feet wrapped with strips of linen, and a cloth around his face. Jesus said to them, "Take off the grave clothes and let him go." 45Therefore many of the Jews who had come to visit Mary, and had seen what Jesus did, put their faith in him. 46But some of them went to the Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done. 47Then the chief priests and the Pharisees called a meeting of the Sanhedrin. "What are we accomplishing?" they asked. "Here is this man performing many miraculous signs. 48If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and take away both our place [3] and our nation." 49Then one of them, named Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, spoke up, "You know nothing at all! 50You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish." 51He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, 52and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one. 53So from that day on they plotted to take his life. 54Therefore Jesus no longer moved about publicly among the Jews. Instead he withdrew to a region near the desert, to a village called Ephraim, where he stayed with his disciples. 55When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, many went up from the country to Jerusalem for their ceremonial cleansing before the Passover. 56They kept looking for Jesus, and as they stood in the temple area they asked one another, "What do you think? Isn't he coming to the Feast at all?" 57But the chief priests and Pharisees had given orders that if anyone found out where Jesus was, he should report it so that they might arrest him.

How does this co-exist with the Vatican's pronouncement that 'erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people'' engendered ``feelings of hostility toward this people.'''

There is nothing erroneous whatsoever. The Jews were and are anti-Christian, and the express murder of 100 million Christians at the hands of Jews embellished in communist drag during 1920-1940 when they slaughtered priests, burned churches, killed devotees of Christ and never once torched a synagogue but in fact had Stalin declare that anti-Semitism was a capital crime. Whereas, anti-Christism was perfectly all right, especially in the Jewish communist state of the USSR where Christian killing went on hidden, because American Jewish newspaper did not and still will not carry it in their pages. If anything, Jews are very protective of their own against we mere goyim.

I believe that I have proven my case. If you see flaws in my reasoning, please print them here so that I may answer your complaints with more facts.

In my opinion, the Jews have, in most ways, brought calamity down upon their own heads. Right now, in America, they are at it again. They have put together a Democratic Party which they run, have all the news sources so that they pick almost all of our political candidates, and they have the biggest lobby and the best media blackmail money can buy. And, of course, our congressmen are the most easily corrupted in the universe, so they work hand-in-hand on selling out the majority of the population which is European and Christian. The replacement of whites and Christians is planned already, and the President has been recently gloating over the fact that whites are planned to be a minority in 2040. What he didn't mention is that by 2140, we will be gone.

And that's genocide, and it's been planned for Christians in America by the Jews, and it's in print everyday, but just not covered for what it is.

For these reasons, I consider the Vatican to be a Jewish-occupied church which is not an anti-christ church. By their documents will you know them.


Long-awaited Vatican document on Jews defends Pius XII

03/16/98 06:23:44 AM

By Frances D'emilio Associated Press Writer

VATICAN CITY (AP) -- The Vatican today expressed deep regret for the ``errors and failures'' of Roman Catholics during the Holocaust but strongly defended wartime Pope Pius XII in a statement promised a decade ago to Jewish groups.

The 12-page document stopped short of apologizing for any failures by church leaders, something bishops in several European countries have done in recent years.

In 1987, Pope John Paul II had promised a statement to Jewish groups based on what role, if any, the church might have had in the Holocaust.

In a preface, the pope, who has made improving relations with Jews a cornerstone of his papacy, expressed hope that the document ``will indeed help to heal the wounds of past misunderstandings and injustices.''

But the document, prepared by the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, seemed destined to anger those hoping for specific apologies.

Only hours earlier, Israel's chief rabbi expressed dismay after learning that the document would only refer in general terms to the church's attitude to the persecution.

Chief Rabbi Meir Lau, himself a Holocaust survivor, demanded an ``explicit apology for the shameful attitude of the Pope (Pius XII) at the time.''

Instead, the document defended Pius XII for using his first encyclical, in 1939, at the start of his papacy, to warn ``against theories which denied the unity of the human race and against the deification of the State,'' and which could all lead to a real ```hour of darkness.'''

The document praised the ``wisdom of Pius XII's diplomacy,'' saying it had been acknowledged several times by Jewish groups. It quoted Golda Meir, the former Israeli prime minister, as saying in 1958 at Pius' death that he raised his voice ``when fearful martyrdom came to our people.''

Asked about the expectations the document would have contained an apology, Australian Cardinal Edward I. Cassidy defended his commission's work.

``It's more than an apology. We feel we need to repent ... for those members of our church who failed'' to do enough, Cassidy said at a news conference.

John Paul reiterated his theme that, at the approach of third millennium of Christianity, the church is urging Catholics to ``examine the responsibility which they too have for the evils of our time.''

The document put distance between the Holocaust and any Christian inspiration.

``The Shoah (Holocaust) was the work of a thoroughly modern neo-pagan regime. Its anti-Semitism had its roots outside of Christianity and, in pursuing its aims, did not hestitate to oppose the church and persecute her members also,'' the document said.

Last fall, French bishops apologized for their silence during the deportation of Jews, and German bishops have said that the church did not do enough to fight Nazism and condemn the Holocaust.

Today's document did not move the pope's position beyond what he expressed last fall to a seminar on anti-Jewish relations: ``In the Christian world -- I do not say on the part of the church as such -- erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New Testament regarding the Jewish people'' engendered ``feelings of hostility toward this people.''

The document did take to task ``governments of some Western countries of Christian tradition, including some in North and South America'' for being ``more than hestitant to open their borders to the persecuted Jews.''

John Paul, the document recalled, has acknowledged that while some Christians were courageous, ``the spiritual resistance and concrete action of other Christians was not that which might have been expected. ...''

``We cannot know how many Christians in countries occupied or ruled by the Nazi powers or their allies were horrified at the disappearance of their Jewish neighbors and yet were not strong enough to raise their voices in protest,'' the document said.

``We deeply regret the errors and failures of those sons and daughters of the church.''

The Vatican in 1993 agreed to have diplomatic ties with Israel, a landmark in John Paul's papacy.

The last Vatican document of landmark proportions on Jewish relations was a 1965 statement that came out of the Second Vatican Council under Paul VI and said the Jews cannot be collectively blamed for the crucifixion of Jesus. top of page

Archived for Educational Purposes only Under U.S.C. Title 17 Section 107 
by Jew Watch Library at


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in the Jew Watch Library is archived here under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. 

If you have additions or suggestions

[email protected]