U.S. invasion of Somalia, OPERATION RESTORE HOPE = OPERATION RESTORE ORDER How did things get so bad? The U.S. and the former Soviet Union spent the last two decades building up the military forces in both Somalia and Ethiopia, each switching sides in the mid-70s. During the 1980s, the U.S. supplied approximately $700 million worth of "foreign aid." (weapons and food ) to the Somalian dictator Siad Barre. The U.S. sole concern was to maintain a regme subordinate to U.S. political and military interests in the volatile area of the Middle East and to directlly counter the Soviet presence in Ethiopia. The Soviet Union collapsed and exited Ethiopia in the late 80s.. Civil war developed in Somalia.. The U.S. continued to support brutal Barre regime "til he lost power in the summer of 1991. Drought, starvation and civil war had already taken a toll of millions in the Horn of Africa and the crisis worsened when the U.S. abandoned Somalia after years of creating its total dependency on imported food. Why has the U.S. returned and why now? The larger relief organizations such as The Red Crescent/Red Cross agencies (ICRC) and Save The Children have been successfully operating in Somalia for well over a year. During this time, the U.N. and U.S. connected relief organizations. have complained that over 80% of their food was being looted, limiting their success. Contrary to media reports which have totally perverted the real story, the crisis seems to revolve around those agencies that refuse to negotiate with the Somali clans. At the same time, even the relatively meager supplies promised to these agencies by the U.S. were not delivered. Again, contrary to media presentation of relief workers welcoming the military, many have criticized the U.S. because the relief efforts in Somalia have been all but shut down under the military occupation by the U.S. It seems the priority of this U.S. force is to impose its own relief plan regardless of any existing efforts that have been functioning with negotiated agreements that recognize the clan infrastructure . The timing on this invasion is more than suspicious. The U.S., in the midst of the changing of the guard, faces a growing dissatisfaction in the way the country is being run. The U.S. Armed Forces are sweating spending cuts and are frantic to justify their $300 billion a year budget in this post-Cold War era. Even the main stream press, The Seattle Times, 12/7/92, touts in its Somalia headlines, "For Marines, crisis comes in handy." * This invasion could also be viewed as a test run on many levels. They have chosen a region where there is almost no opposition or economic interest by other nations. Here, the military is able to test deployment speed, troop movement and weaponry with little risk. They are working on and improving their new model for military actions in the face of the changing political conditions around the world. In a Seattle Times editorial, Somalia was said to have the,"perfect laboratory conditions for invasion." * Through the United Nations, the U.S. rulers are testing out relationships with the junior imperialists and Third World rulers. The U.S. is forging and testing loyalties. They"re finding out who will lie in the gutters with them and how much will it cost to buy them. Who will they prop up in power in Somalia before they leave? * During the last year we have been overwhelmed with pictures of thousands of poor, starving, and ill Somalian people. With all of the resources, it is criminal for people to starve anywhere in the world today. The people in Somalia ARE in desperate need. But we have to remember how the U.S. has used the media in the past to paint their picture of reality and crisis. The U.S. is again using the media to manipulate our emotions to meet their own needs, not the Somalian peoples needs. We see pictures of starving Somalians, do we see who ruined their economy and lives? We hear them refer to "armed thugs," do we learn who armed them? Like the Persian Gulf War, the U.S. government is honing its ability to control public opinion through control of the media, and the media is falling all over themselves to help. Racist chauvinism Operation Restore Hope is another case of the "white man"s burden," that supposed supreme mandate to take care of the "less fortunate" around the world. But the reality is one of take from not take care of. When was the last time we invaded a "white" country? Grenada, Panama, Iraq and now Somalia, all are non-European nations, so-called "Third World" countries who "could not survive without U.S. help." Of course, the fact that the U.S. has more prisoners per capita than any other country on this earth, or that it is crumbling under the weight of its own violence, poverty and economic crisis is of no significance. The U.S. will arrogantly presume to tell the African clanspeople of Somalia that "we know better" and "we will fix it for you." The people of Somalia are not helpless. They were better off before the U.S. and the other colonial imperialists came and will be better off when they have left for good. The White House doesn"t give a damn about starving people, whether in Somalia or on the streets of Washington, D.C. They will starve people for political reasons just as readily as they will feed them for political reasons. And while they pat themselves on their humanitarian backs, these U.S. rulers are continuing to uphold brutal sanctions against the people of Iraq -withholding food, medicine and chemicals used to purify the water, causing thousands to needlessly die. We know that humanitarianism has never flowed from the barrels of U.S. weapons. In spite of their words, we have seen the reality the U.S. military brings; suffering, death, destruction and oppression. Humanitarianism Never Flows From the Barrel of a U.S. Weapon Oppose the U.S. Invasion of Somalia, Troops Out Now ! Vietnam Veterans Against the War Anti-Imperialist PO Box 95172, Seattle, WA 98145-2172 Phone (206) 328-4377 FAX (206) 528-1342