Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!torn!watserv3.uwaterloo.ca!undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!neumann.uwaterloo.ca!alopez-o From: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Alex Lopez-Ortiz) Newsgroups: sci.math,news.answers,sci.answers Subject: sci.math FAQ: The Four Colour Theorem Followup-To: sci.math Date: 17 Feb 2000 22:52:04 GMT Organization: University of Waterloo Lines: 65 Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu Expires: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 09:55:55 Message-ID: <88hu2k\$qu6\$1@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> Reply-To: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca NNTP-Posting-Host: daisy.uwaterloo.ca Summary: Part 17 of 31, New version Originator: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca Originator: alopez-o@daisy.uwaterloo.ca Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu sci.math:347398 news.answers:177518 sci.answers:11226 Archive-name: sci-math-faq/fourcolour Last-modified: February 20, 1998 Version: 7.5 The Four Colour Theorem Theorem 2 [Four Colour Theorem] Every planar map with regions of simple borders can be coloured with 4 colours in such a way that no two regions sharing a non-zero length border have the same colour. An equivalent combinatorial interpretation is Theorem 3 [Four Colour Theorem] Every loopless planar graph admits a vertex-colouring with at most four different colours. This theorem was proved with the aid of a computer in 1976. The proof shows that if aprox. 1,936 basic forms of maps can be coloured with four colours, then any given map can be coloured with four colours. A computer program coloured these basic forms. So far nobody has been able to prove it without using a computer. In principle it is possible to emulate the computer proof by hand computations. The known proofs work by way of contradiction. The basic thrust of the proof is to assume that there are counterexamples, thus there must be minimal counterexamples in the sense that any subset of the graphic is four colourable. Then it is shown that all such minimal counterexamples must contain a subgraph from a set basic configurations. But it turns out that any one of those basic counterexamples can be replaced by something smaller, while preserving the need for five colours, thus contradicting minimality. The number of basic forms, or configurations has been reduced to 633. A recent simplification of the Four Colour Theorem proof, by Robertson, Sanders, Seymour and Thomas, has removed the cloud of doubt hanging over the complex original proof of Appel and Haken. The programs can now be obtained by ftp and easily checked over for correctness. Also the paper part of the proof is easier to verify. This new proof, if correct, should dispel all reasonable criticisms of the validity of the proof of this theorem. References K. Appel and W. Haken. Every planar map is four colorable. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 82, 1976 pp.711-712. K. Appel and W. Haken. Every planar map is four colorable. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21, 1977, pp. 429-567. N. Robertson, D. Sanders, P. Seymour, R. Thomas The Four Colour Theorem Preprint, February 1994. Available by anonymous ftp from ftp.math.gatech.edu, in directory /pub/users/thomas/fcdir/npfc.ps. The Four Color Theorem: Assault and Conquest T. Saaty and Paul Kainen. McGraw-Hill, 1977. Reprinted by Dover Publications 1986. -- Alex Lopez-Ortiz alopez-o@unb.ca http://www.cs.unb.ca/~alopez-o Assistant Professor Faculty of Computer Science University of New Brunswick