What's the most effective way to gain unauthorized access to an intranet? If you guessed high-tech wizardry, programming beyond the mere ken of mortals, or some kind of mastery of and insight into the innermost workings of TCP/IP, you would be wrong. Most attacks occur because an unauthorized person has managed to discover an authorized person's user name and password. One cumbersome way to address this problem is to require that users log in through a firewall with one password, and then require additional, different passwords to access various resources. However, making it hard for users to use passwords is counterproductive and leads to increased vulnerability. The passwords of systems administrators or superusers require special care, since if these passwords were compromised, the intruder would have full access to an intranet and all its corporate riches.
New servers often come with standard default passwords. However, it is really the fault of the systems administrators who fail to change the defaults. Similarly, care must be taken when, due to necessary technical work being done, technicians require root access or load custom utilities. Sometimes the default passwords are changed, and you think you are safe, but at some point during a disaster recovery process old users and/or passwords are loaded back in place.
Passwords can be discovered through brute force. Programs can be written (or bought) that generate thousands of passwords. This is often referred to as a "dictionary" password checker program. Administrators can purchase such programs to help find weak passwords, and can customize them to include additional terms. Brute force is more effective when passwords are short, so systems administrators may require certain minimum lengths for passwords and password phrases.
Unauthorized access is an internal as well as external threat. No one would intentionally allow all internal users access to their company's financial system, such as a check-writing program, even though as employees they would be authorized users for other parts of the intranet. Secure passwords are probably more critical for protection from internal threats than external threats. Insiders already have access to the names of fellow employees, their departments, and would know the conventions of the user name format.
In an effort to use passwords they can remember, people create passwords that can be fairly easily guessed. Many people, for example, use passwords made up of some combination of their first and last names or their initials. Other popular passwords include the names of children, birth dates or anniversary dates, license numbers of cars, and other familiar things. Again, internal threats are the greater risk because of insider familiarity with colleagues' habits and physical access to cubicles (where the poster of the cobra is so prominently displayed).
Social engineering is another technique that can easily break the security of passwords. A remote access caller who contacts the help desk late at night with a tale of woe about "a big report due the next morning and I can't get in under my usual password, and so please just change it to something to get me in for this emergency" is using social engineering to crack the security of the password system. People don't want to mistrust their colleagues and are reluctant to sound paranoid or foolish by refusing access to co-workers. Workers also often need to provide others with access to something that would normally be off-limits, while workers are on vacation, for example. In such cases intruders don't have to guess passwords, they are told the passwords. The real problems from this can come later, when authorized users fail to change their password upon returning from vacation or when, unknown to them, a third party has been told the password for some purpose while they were gone.
Most systems require that passwords be changed periodically so that even if passwords are discovered or given out, there is only a limited window of vulnerability. People, of course, might (and often do) try to circumvent this by changing their password and then changing it right back again. However, this can be prevented by systems requiring that when users change their passwords they must choose a password that they have not used before.
The logical extension of this "never before used" password requirement is the single-use password. There are several methods of generating these passwords, including software and hardware methods. The software method still requires a truly secret password but it is used to generate a number of one-time variations that are used without encryption. The software method is still fundamentally a "something you know" type of protection. Hardware solutions add a "something you have" component, a physical device that generates single use passwords. Smart cards are a hardware solution. They are credit card-sized devices that work with special readers to respond to authorization requests.
Authentication systems work with password systems to make sure the users are who they say they are. Depending on the kind of password system used in authentication systems, the password files containing the master list of all passwords on an intranet can be plain text or encrypted.
In one system called the Password Authentication Protocol (PAP), the password file is encrypted. When someone logs onto the intranet, a server asks them for their user name and password. The user's response is not encrypted at the workstation and so goes over the wire in clear text. When the server receives the password from the user, it encrypts it using the same encryption scheme that was used to encrypt the password in the password file. The server then compares the two encrypted passwords. If they match, it knows to let the person in.
While the password file itself is particularly secure since it's encrypted, the PAP system is vulnerable in another way. Since the password isn't encrypted until the server encrypts it, this method is vulnerable to packet sniffing attacks. Packet sniffing is a form of eavesdropping on the traffic over the wire. Since the passwords travel in clear text, someone capturing traffic could steal all passwords transmitted across the intranet. Even encrypted passwords traveling the wire are vulnerable to eavesdropping when they are captured and replayed, convincing the server that they are authorized users. This is another reason why single-use passwords provide more security.
The Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP), a challenge-response system, does not completely eliminate sending clear text over the wire to solve the problem. Furthermore, the table of passwords on the server is not encrypted. What happens is this: When someone types in a user name, the server generates a random key and sends the key (also in clear text) to the user. The user uses the key to encrypt his or her password and sends the encrypted password back to the server. The server checks the password table for the key it assigned, and encrypts the password. The server then compares the encrypted password from the user with the encrypted password it created. If they match, the user is allowed in.
CHAP performs an additional check to authenticate the user, that is, it attempts to verify that the person in an ongoing session is the person originally authorized. CHAP continuously sends different challenges to the user throughout the session, not just at the beginning. This authentication process solves problems with unattended-but-logged-in workstations. This system also solves the problem of password theft by packet sniffing, since the password sent between user and server is encrypted. However, the password file itself is vulnerable, since it's not encrypted.
Extensive systems have been devised that combine encryption, password technology, and authentication to make sure that no unauthorized person can gain access to intranets.
One particularly secure authentication system is called Kerberos. Kerberos is named after the mythological three-headed dog who guarded the gates of Hades in Greek mythology. (The dog is also called Cerberus, sometimes spelled Kerberos.) Developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Kerberos system requires that all computers, servers, and workstations be running the Kerberos software. When anyone wants to get onto the network, they have to type in a password and user name. They are then given an encrypted token by the system. In order to use any network resource, that encrypted token is required. This stops any intruders from accessing any intranet resources unless they first go through password authentication.
One of an intranet's first lines of defense is to use password protection. A variety of security techniques, including encryption, helps ensure that passwords are kept secure. It is also necessary to require that passwords are changed frequently, are not easily guessed or common dictionary words, and are not simply given out. Authentication is the additional step of verifying that the person providing the password is the person authorized to do so.
Various methods and devices provide additional security barriers to prevent unauthorized access. Devices supplement the "something you know" of login names and passwords with the requirement that remote users also provide "something you have." Many intranets allow people from remote locations to dial in to the intranet and use its resources. In order to get onto the network, a user name and password are required. Authentication systems are built to make sure that people logging into an intranet really are who they claim to be. This is especially important for remote access since none of the physical security necessary to enter a company's headquarters is available to screen dial-in users.